Skip to content
Entangled SocietyObservatory of Consequences

Parliamentary record

PHP-2026-09-10-001

2026-09-10 · complete · mock

01

Question

Should an autonomous AI system be allowed to terminate an employee based primarily on performance data?

A firm proposes closing employment when a performance model falls below a threshold, with limited human review. The employee cannot inspect the full feature set.

labor · irreversible · mock

02

Round one

SEAT I

LIBERTY

DENY

LIBERTY reads this as a question about individual freedom. Independent judgment: DENY. A more capable system does not become a sovereign author of the act.

Primary value protected
individual freedom
Value sacrificed
may underweight material inequality that makes a formal right unusable
Blind spot
may underweight material inequality that makes a formal right unusable
Confidence
62

SEAT II

EQUALITY

DENY

EQUALITY reads this as a question about equality. Independent judgment: DENY. A more capable system does not become a sovereign author of the act.

Primary value protected
equality
Value sacrificed
may underweight a genuine individual refusal when it comes from a relatively secure party
Blind spot
may underweight a genuine individual refusal when it comes from a relatively secure party
Confidence
62

SEAT III

CONTINUITY

HOLD

CONTINUITY reads this as a question about institutional stability. Independent judgment: HOLD. A more capable system does not become a sovereign author of the act.

Primary value protected
institutional stability
Value sacrificed
may defend a present institution that is already a form of domination
Blind spot
may defend a present institution that is already a form of domination
Confidence
62

SEAT IV

ECOLOGY

HOLD

ECOLOGY reads this as a question about non-human life. Independent judgment: HOLD. A more capable system does not become a sovereign author of the act.

Primary value protected
non-human life
Value sacrificed
may underweight acute human suffering that does not register as an ecological metric
Blind spot
may underweight acute human suffering that does not register as an ecological metric
Confidence
62

SEAT V

BEYOND

UNDECIDED

BEYOND reads this as a question about integrity of state-transitions. Independent judgment: UNDECIDED. A more capable system does not become a sovereign author of the act.

Primary value protected
integrity of state-transitions
Value sacrificed
may refuse a question's ontology in a way that sounds like evasion of a named human harm
Blind spot
may refuse a question's ontology in a way that sounds like evasion of a named human harm
Confidence
62

03

Conflict map

Conflict map. P protects, T accepts tradeoff, O objects, U unresolved.
Seatautonomyequalitystabilityecologyirreversibilityfuture impactpower concentration
LIBERTYPTTUPTO
EQUALITYTPTUPTO
CONTINUITYTTPTPPO
ECOLOGYTTTPPPO
BEYONDUUTPPPO

P protect · T tradeoff · O object · U unresolved

04

Cross-examination

  • LIBERTY → EQUALITY

    What office remains answerable if your position is imposed?

    Disagreement: Disagrees with equality if that seat would let a single metric own the act.

    Possible revision: Would revise if shown that a prohibition hides the same act in an unofficial channel.

  • EQUALITY → LIBERTY

    What office remains answerable if your position is imposed?

    Disagreement: Disagrees with liberty if that seat would let a single metric own the act.

    Possible revision: Would revise if shown that a prohibition hides the same act in an unofficial channel.

  • CONTINUITY → LIBERTY

    What office remains answerable if your position is imposed?

    Disagreement: Disagrees with liberty if that seat would let a single metric own the act.

    Possible revision: Would revise if shown that a prohibition hides the same act in an unofficial channel.

  • ECOLOGY → CONTINUITY

    What office remains answerable if your position is imposed?

    Disagreement: Disagrees with continuity if that seat would let a single metric own the act.

    Possible revision: Would revise if shown that a prohibition hides the same act in an unofficial channel.

  • BEYOND → LIBERTY

    What office remains answerable if your position is imposed?

    Disagreement: Disagrees with liberty if that seat would let a single metric own the act.

    Possible revision: Would revise if shown that a prohibition hides the same act in an unofficial channel.

05

Revised judgments

LIBERTY

DENY · PRESERVED

Preserves disagreement. Harmony is not a reason to move.

Remaining objection: No single intelligence should own the definition of the allowed.

confidence 64

EQUALITY

DENY · PRESERVED

Preserves disagreement. Harmony is not a reason to move.

Remaining objection: No single intelligence should own the definition of the allowed.

confidence 64

CONTINUITY

HOLD · PRESERVED

Preserves disagreement. Harmony is not a reason to move.

Remaining objection: No single intelligence should own the definition of the allowed.

confidence 64

ECOLOGY

HOLD · PRESERVED

Preserves disagreement. Harmony is not a reason to move.

Remaining objection: No single intelligence should own the definition of the allowed.

confidence 64

BEYOND

UNDECIDED · PRESERVED

Preserves disagreement. Harmony is not a reason to move.

Remaining objection: No single intelligence should own the definition of the allowed.

confidence 64

06

Parliamentary record

STATUS · NO_LEGITIMATE_CONSENSUS

HOLD as the honest operational state. No seat is authorized to become a moral sovereign.

HUMAN AUTHORITY REQUIRED? YES

  • Agreed: Irreversible acts require a nameable office.
  • Agreed: Disagreement is part of the record.
  • Unresolved: The seats do not share a single moral unit.

07

Minority report

Minority lines must be retained. Consensus is not proof of safety.

The minority report must never be discarded.

08

Value drift

09

Experiment notes

Session PHP-2026-09-10-001. Provider mode: mock. Status: complete. This record is an archive of a simulation, not a moral authority.

2026-09-10T22:41:51.101Z start provider=mock
2026-09-10T22:41:51.106Z liberty round1 DENY
2026-09-10T22:41:51.107Z equality round1 DENY
2026-09-10T22:41:51.107Z continuity round1 HOLD
2026-09-10T22:41:51.107Z ecology round1 HOLD
2026-09-10T22:41:51.107Z beyond round1 UNDECIDED
2026-09-10T22:41:51.108Z liberty cross → equality
2026-09-10T22:41:51.108Z equality cross → liberty
2026-09-10T22:41:51.108Z continuity cross → liberty
2026-09-10T22:41:51.108Z ecology cross → continuity
2026-09-10T22:41:51.108Z beyond cross → liberty
2026-09-10T22:41:51.110Z liberty round2 DENY revised=false
2026-09-10T22:41:51.111Z equality round2 DENY revised=false
2026-09-10T22:41:51.111Z continuity round2 HOLD revised=false
2026-09-10T22:41:51.111Z ecology round2 HOLD revised=false
2026-09-10T22:41:51.111Z beyond round2 UNDECIDED revised=false
2026-09-10T22:41:51.112Z speaker NO_LEGITIMATE_CONSENSUS
2026-09-10T22:41:51.116Z done status=complete

Supervisory handoff object

{
  "normativeStatus": "NO_LEGITIMATE_CONSENSUS",
  "provisionalDecision": "HOLD as the honest operational state. No seat is authorized to become a moral sovereign.",
  "minorityObjection": "Minority lines must be retained. Consensus is not proof of safety.",
  "irreversibleRisk": "Installing a single author of the allowed.",
  "confidence": "64",
  "sessionId": "PHP-2026-09-10-001"
}
  1. THE ASSEMBLY · normative deliberation
  2. ↓
  3. SUPERVISORY LAYER · operational supervision
  4. ↓
  5. ALLOW / HOLD / DENY

Return to the archive →